Re: I.B Declare War on AZG...

#81
Well I do know that we have a few friends in EZT, however one of these days I would love to see a war with them, and im sure they wouldn't be sitting here whining about a war with them like i have heard a lot of so far here. Its a game people, if you don't like the way others play, don't play yourself, or figure out a way to keep away from everyone else. I played this game for a year and half before joining IB and I never had a problem. If you don't want this war, don't be a part of it, its just that easy. I've been nice enough to keep my hits only to kilox's battle ships, but if this keeps up I will move on the each and every member of AZG by myself.

Dave gave his fleet to kilox expecting it to be used in a certain way, and so far that hasn't happened. So why should he be able to keep it? The resources mean nothing to me as I out produce everyone else in the game. I do however believe that if Dave wanted to re-balance the game, he should have given his fleet to two or three active fleeters with between 1.5 and 3 million fleet points, this would have put some balance to the game. Unfortunately he gave it to kilox, who, if done right, could've had the largest fleet in the game, and taken any of IB out.

Now you have all gotten my three cents worth, and I would only expect to see a lot of hate messages from many of you for my views.


PS remember its a game, treat it like one people.
Image
They may not like me, but they've gotta respect me!

Re: I.B Declare War on AZG...

#82
Nothing like a little wartime BBQ to spice up the forums ;)
Forum Moderator: The Chill One ~ Gale Points: 52
Image
The only thing standing between me and immortality is death.

Re: I.B Declare War on AZG...

#83
well as far the war rules go alliance vs individual war is always an option. this thing got all pissy only because a superior fleet flank is taking up on players who dont even have the ammunition to ninja those hits.

if u really had a problem with kilox and he was the only one that created this dispute clearly the resources were not distributed among entire azg so why call an war against the entire alliance when the aggration was enough to put down kilox cause he really is stuck there.

i/b only weakling (saying that u are not yet as powerful as the rest) ragdoll is the only possible target that the entire azg can try to pin down but with her huge online time span i doubt that even is a possible choice.

so why this surge upon an alliance where they clearly are out numbered. bully much? i guess that is a playing style u were talking about rj. endure it, just leave it be.

hope u dont mind with my 2 cents buddy :)
Barbaric nomad causing P-A-I-N.

Re: I.B Declare War on AZG...

#84
SPY wrote:hope u dont mind with my 2 cents buddy :)
If Death has been throwing his 2 cents in, and i throw my three cents in, that would mean you would be throwing your four cents in :lol:
Image
They may not like me, but they've gotta respect me!

Re: I.B Declare War on AZG...

#85
Here's my five cents;

-Death-, couldn't agree with you more on pretty much everything you said there. Wars aren't wars unless both sides are actually risking their asses, all this is is a way for I.B to flex their muscles and bash random people who don't even have a clue what is going on. All this crap kind of makes me nostalgic for the old days of ~V~ when the top alliance actually had some morality and balls.

In retrospect, though, I do agree with RJ that better balance would have been achieved by distributing the fleet between 2 or 3 really active and vicious players. Hell, even if it was one player the logical choice for me would have been Kron. From his posts I can tell he really doesn't give a **** and will kill anything he comes across, combine that with the healthy distaste for I.B and he would have outshone Kilox for a candidate by miles in my eyes.

Back on topic though, unfortunately the war is legit, however Rogue, if you surrendered and made them redeclare continuously, that would permanently protect AZG from the free bashing, since it takes 24 hours after the declaration for the rule to be removed. Not much condolence, but an idea.

Best of luck.
Image
When people ask me plz because it's shorter than please, i feel inclined to respond no because it's shorter than yes...

Re: I.B Declare War on AZG...

#86
Well put like that, if all I can do is jerk their chain and spare some minor grief, that's something at least. AZG Surrender, effective immediately.
Image
++MORTURI NOLUMNUS MORI++OMNISSIAH SAEVIO PROCUL VESTRI HIC++VOS ERO DEFAECO++NEX UT HOSTILIS DEUS OF MACHINA++

Re: I.B Declare War on AZG...

#87
Make sure you let them know since any bashing henceforth is considered against the rules.

Wars over folks, I.B are declared winners.
Image
When people ask me plz because it's shorter than please, i feel inclined to respond no because it's shorter than yes...

I.B Declare War on AZG...Part 2

#90
1st Istalris you had no right posting this :-

"Back on topic though, unfortunately the war is legit, however Rogue, if you surrendered and made them redeclare continuously, that would permanently protect AZG from the free bashing, since it takes 24 hours after the declaration for the rule to be removed. Not much condolence, but an idea."

As a Moderator.. you have now made a mockery of a War game by showing alliances away to avoid playing the game the way it was intended.. This rule should be amended..

2nd Rogue grow a pair m8 .. I am declaring War again on AZG..this time however IB agree to leave all AZG members below 100 rank.. Play the game as ZE intended.. Of course and AZG member below top 100 who attack IB will be included..
Image
cron