Re: Azguard
#42well id say an alliance thats on the first page, but not on the top, like in the 30's or 40's number, maybe even lower. I know that its good to have experienced players, but some things are better learned by trial and error, and just getting better, then having some spoon feed ya information. thats the way i look at it anyway. but hey, its cool
And a group of people learning together isnt exactly a bad thing... idk, im pretty new yet, so yeah.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81416/81416982005b0c7e8363ea593c246e0c06f8a363" alt="Cool 8-)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2f32/b2f327595bc7f45e1dff28aaac2d83fe519ae18c" alt="Image"
Re: Azguard
#43I'd like to disagree. Proof being T_Fcorbeil wrote:If new players really want to learn, i would suggest they find one of the weaker alliances who can actually help. young alliances seem to help more often then the stronger ones because they are closer in points (as in they don't say its not worth the time to teach them), and smaller alliances seem more tightly knit. Just saying, idk who agrees with me, but w/e
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52284/5228488bfbb8e1ac8c313c64c68d9c500e291cad" alt="Smile :)"
We teach the ones willing to learn. We just let the ones who don't listen crash and burn, go inactive, and then kick them. Sadly, it seems only a small player-base actually wants to learn. Most just seem to want to have everything handed to them.
I've never thought it a waste of time to teach players what I know (Granted it may not be a whole lot, but it is better than nothing).