crabsemite(RAWK) vs. Gozar(~A~) TD 54.427.450

#1
Ran across a weak spot when I was mass probing the galaxy this took place in (I'm not telling which one :P)

Winnings: Metal 3.414.418 Crystal 1.706.747 Deuterium 6.131.367
Attacker Loss: The attacker has lost a total of 16.770.000 units.
Defender Loss: The defender has lost a total of 37.657.450 units.
Debris Field: 10.307.820 11.632.650

All DF collected. I really lucked out lol, I thought for sure I would get ninja'ed

GLOTR Gozar (Like you even need luck to rebuild lol)

Let this be a lesson to the community, nutcases like me are dangerous XD
Last edited by Desert_Reaper on Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
20 GP
The Trouble Maker
As Swift as the Wind that carries the Sand comes your DEATH

Omega Class Thank You to Devola/Gale for this super amazing sig.

Re: crabsemite(RAWK) vs. Gozar(~A~) TD 54.427.450

#9
This isnt a bad hit. This was just a poor choice of hits out there. Ive seen profit that I could take down if I had that fleet. So.....I hit for profit and as far as this goes for profit it doesn't go that far, and before some say this quote on quote "Profits Profit." Think bout this if you had a chance for a bigger hit over a personal one which would you choose?
Image
Dumb for not doing this earlier but thanks for the sig Gale.

Re: crabsemite(RAWK) vs. Gozar(~A~) TD 54.427.450

#10
pupairo12 wrote:I have to agree with Rag. Good job DR, way to have the courage to stand up to Gozar. You didn't deserve what ~A~ did to you. And all members of ~A~ who read this, if Gozar can fight his own battles, why did Torgard get involved?
Havent they always said its a team?

tho the drama behind all the composition of torgads hit was probably some spice rather than actual intent before hitting.

anyway i wouldnt say if a defender deserved a hit or not. it was a good crash, on this thread gozar fell short to crabsemite on the other hand crabsemite fell short to torgard.

take it easy guys.
Barbaric nomad causing P-A-I-N.