Re: ban one man alliances from rankings
#21Nice suggestion, but in proportion, 1 a week doesn't translated into two a month, it would be 4 a month.
Average Person ~ Gale Points: 28
RIP Me.
Re: ban one man alliances from rankings
#22As long as they are off the rankings thats enough for me, because i dont see why someone cant have there own tag, its just the fact its not an alliance so it shouldnt be on the rankings 
Re: ban one man alliances from rankings
#23What I was trying to say is a player may create a maximum of 2 alliances a month and no more frequent than 1 per weekpupairo12 wrote:Nice suggestion, but in proportion, 1 a week doesn't translated into two a month, it would be 4 a month.
Those with nothing to loose have the most to gain. Long live the Miner!
Re: ban one man alliances from rankings
#25With all of this talk of single players having tags, that'll be fixed when player profiles come out anyway.
Average Person ~ Gale Points: 28
RIP Me.
Re: ban one man alliances from rankings
#26I would have 'liked' this one too lolpupairo12 wrote:With all of this talk of single players having tags, that'll be fixed when player profiles come out anyway.
Re: ban one man alliances from rankings
#27These alliances need to be banned from rankings becuase they are not alliances by definition. An alliance needs multiple members to be considered an alliance.
"Steal from one and you are a thief. Steal from all and you are the government"
Re: ban one man alliances from rankings
#28I completely agree with this idea.... but the problem is then how does one start an alliance? All leaders are alone in the beginning and a time cap wouldn't be fair at all if they're honestly trying to recruit.
_______________________Public Relations Administrator______________________
__________________A tongue of silver is worth plenty in gold._________________
[/color]__________________A tongue of silver is worth plenty in gold._________________
Re: ban one man alliances from rankings
#29A solution that solves the problem.Istalris wrote:I always thought alliances were a bit too carefree and frivolous in ZE, this being one of the reasons. If you don't want to list only real alliances in the rankings how about create a "charter" system, where you have to get the agreement of several (2+) players before an alliance is created.
For example, replace the current alliance creation system with the charter system, you can search for charters with tags and add your 'signature' to it through an app (creator must accept signature), once said charter has reaches a pre-set (by the player, but 2 minimum) amount of signatures, the alliance is created as normal.
This would no doubt solve this issue without altering the ranking script even more, as well as add a bit more seriousness to alliances as a whole.
Chat Administrator ~ 7 Gale Points
Re: ban one man alliances from rankings
#30Or just skip the ones with 1 member in them when you look at ranks. Unless most alliances blow chunks there is only gonna be a few in the top20 anyway.
Xtreme Uni - Zorgon1
Standard Uni - Zorgon1
Speed Uni - Swerg
Massacre Uni - Pokemon_Master
Phear me o_O
Standard Uni - Zorgon1
Speed Uni - Swerg
Massacre Uni - Pokemon_Master
Phear me o_O