[quote][√R X (100-√M)
/quote]
so what does that equation give? u sure R should be sqrt
Re: My assumption on points in standard...
#12In words this is "The square root of deathstars times (100 minus the square root of the moon's diameter)"acewoonder wrote:√R X (100-√M
It's to test out the number of deathstars you send against a moon. Say you send 15 RIPs against a 8k moon. √8000 = 89.4427190999158. 100 - 89.4427190999158 = 10.5572809000842. The square root of 15 equals 3.87283346207416885. 3.87283346207416885 times 10.5572809000842 equals 40.888173107259. So you would have a 40.88% chance to destroy a moon by sending 15 RIPs.bruteforce wrote:[√R X (100-√M)
/quote]
so what does that equation give? u sure R should be sqrt
Forum Moderator: The Illiterate One
10 Gale Points FTW
10 Gale Points FTW
Zorg wrote:Ace is so much sexier than Acewoonder
Re: My assumption on points in standard...
#14I believe that this formula becomes inaccurate if the moon size is above 9k though, haven't ever popped a moon that big so I don't know for sure.
Re: My assumption on points in standard...
#15Is it still impossible to pop or even obtain a 10k moon?
Gale points:ummm to far behind to care and too long since I got one to remember
That which is written without effort is usually read without enjoyment.
That which is written without effort is usually read without enjoyment.
Re: My assumption on points in standard...
#16It's impossible to pop, and nearly impossible to obtain.
Forum Moderator: The Illiterate One
10 Gale Points FTW
10 Gale Points FTW
Zorg wrote:Ace is so much sexier than Acewoonder
Re: My assumption on points in standard...
#17So this is good to know. If the moon is 10k It can not be popped. But if it is under 10k even 9999. You can still pop it with this foumla?
THERE WILL BE NO MORE TURTLE POWER IN STANDAR ANYMORE!!!
WE FLEETERS ARE STARTING TO FLIP YOU ON YOUR BACK AND SPIN YOU AROUND UNTIL YOU GIVE UP!!!!!
WE FLEETERS ARE STARTING TO FLIP YOU ON YOUR BACK AND SPIN YOU AROUND UNTIL YOU GIVE UP!!!!!
Re: My assumption on points in standard...
#18yes because all of the numbers for potetial moon diameters will fit into this formula.unless it is under 100[there aren't any that small I've heard of] I think.and you can't have a zero diameter moon.so I am pretty sure everymoon under 9999 that you can get on zorg is calcuable.
Gale points:ummm to far behind to care and too long since I got one to remember
That which is written without effort is usually read without enjoyment.
That which is written without effort is usually read without enjoyment.
Re: My assumption on points in standard...
#19And the only size over that is a size nobody has yet to be known to have. Unless Weresloth has found it yet. >.>Dr_triad3 wrote:everymoon under 9999 that you can get on zorg is calcuable.
Forum Moderator: The Illiterate One
10 Gale Points FTW
10 Gale Points FTW
Zorg wrote:Ace is so much sexier than Acewoonder
Re: My assumption on points in standard...
#20Oh, people were expecting me to do that?
Forum Administrator
Noblesse Oblige 77 MP