Spankie wrote:you wanna be fair? well you are comparing an Active battle vs inactives. I was not harrassing AZG, just wondering why there were so many ( i ) battles, as in, are both sides getting good at FS, but as usual you take offense to anything so whatever. Have fun with this petty war. Dacia took advantage of a battered AZG and AZG said how they were gonna stomp Dacia for doing so, seems neither of you have or will get what you wanted out of it. Sometimes a treaty to endlessness is valid.

Um, the only (i) battles there were, were the last couple against blueangel... the rest were all against actives
Most of them that i know off anyways..

Defiant wrote:

Spankie wrote:you wanna be fair? well you are comparing an Active battle vs inactives. I was not harrassing AZG, just wondering why there were so many ( i ) battles, as in, are both sides getting good at FS, but as usual you take offense to anything so whatever. Have fun with this petty war. Dacia took advantage of a battered AZG and AZG said how they were gonna stomp Dacia for doing so, seems neither of you have or will get what you wanted out of it. Sometimes a treaty to endlessness is valid.

Um, the only (i) battles there were, were the last couple against blueangel... the rest were all against actives
Most of them that i know off anyways..

Thank you for agreeing with me Defiant. Its nice to see that you agree with me

Dacia, you can't win, you already lost more than half of your members. You only have 13, while as before you started you had 31. This war is getting pointless for you, why don't you preserve the remaining dignity you still have and surrender?

Why should they surrender they bearly got anyone left i think they should disband and seek shelter

just my opinion

And that too!

pwnage wrote:Dacia, you can't win, you already lost more than half of your members. You only have 13, while as before you started you had 31. This war is getting pointless for you, why don't you preserve the remaining dignity you still have and surrender?

oddly enough that is EXACTLY what was told to AZG when they were at war with ~V~. And the only reason they finally surrendered to ~V~ was to deal with Dacia. So, if somebody would please start a war with Dacia so they can surrender to AZG it would surely help this situation, dont you think?

I think Azure already tried that one

so true

Spankie wrote:you wanna be fair? well you are comparing an Active battle vs inactives. I was not harrassing AZG, just wondering why there were so many ( i ) battles, as in, are both sides getting good at FS, but as usual you take offense to anything so whatever. Have fun with this petty war. Dacia took advantage of a battered AZG and AZG said how they were gonna stomp Dacia for doing so, seems neither of you have or will get what you wanted out of it. Sometimes a treaty to endlessness is valid.

I wasnt taking offence mate, I was just pointing out why we're behind in the TD. One act, rather than the continuous hurt AZG as been putting on Dacia or an effective offensive by them.
Although it seems to mostly be a combination of there being very few dacia targets out there worth hitting atm, and of them, the only ones I know of I cant personally hit. The main work is mainly by a few people in AZG. I personally cant really do much but freak out Dacian1 with mobile colonies. Left it three days after the scans stopped, then upgraded the mines and things a bit, then got 42 spy attacks on it by Dacians over the next 24 hours. Yay psychological warfare...

Also AZG was considering a surrender anyway, it took the Dacia war to get V to present something resembling decent terms.
We're not insisting on attempting to humiliate Dacia by renaming their planets 'owned by v' or w.e though. If I were them Id suck it up. Dacian1, ilie and the rest of the big names who remain cant put any serious hurt on the important AZG players, and Ilie and the rest either FS too effectively or have turtled up enough for our bigguns to smash. But their time will come, I know a certain death god with his eyes on the prize