Re: Player Awards (Discussion)
#72D'awww, i'm blushing.Sadbutrue wrote:i love RAWK

-Istalris-

Re: Player Awards (Discussion)
#73The_Templar wrote:Come on Paradox, in the alliances section you could simply say RAWK instead of "pass for obvious reasons"...try it, it doesn't hurt
ahhh, Templar it must be taff to accept a noob overtaking you - nah, i pass couse im following simple rules ... personaly i think Rawk is not in position to challange V ... do you?

Re: Player Awards (Discussion)
#74I don't know sweety...by the way, who's the noob you 're talking about?Paradox wrote:The_Templar wrote:Come on Paradox, in the alliances section you could simply say RAWK instead of "pass for obvious reasons"...try it, it doesn't hurt
ahhh, Templar it must be taff to accept a noob overtaking you - nah, i pass couse im following simple rules ... personaly i think Rawk is not in position to challange V ... do you?
Destroy it and in three days I will rebuild it
Re: Player Awards (Discussion)
#75She's probably referring to me.
-Istalris-

-Istalris-

Re: Player Awards (Discussion)
#76Oh no, the Merchant is winning

Noblesse Oblige 77 MP
Re: Player Awards (Discussion)
#77Gamepro41, your votes will not be counted unless you follow the rules. You cannot vote for yourself.
-Istalris-
-Istalris-

Re: Player Awards (Discussion)
#78what is this voting i just joined forums today could someone please tell me what it is

Eldrith~Arathis
General
Speed Server
~raiders~
Re: Player Awards (Discussion)
#79You just vote for people who you think deserve the awards

Noblesse Oblige 77 MP