Well, the same disadvantages and errors were present during ~V~ and AZG. No telling how much of each side was nothing but cheap defense.Grig4099 wrote:I've tried to explain to my colegues the TD mess. I hope that from now on will not be any more problems with adding the TD. At least I shall try to post my colegues atacks and TD counting.
The main problem with TD is the fact that is not offering a clear image of the real demages produces to other player or aliance. Sometimes the same defense is just reported several times us beeing destroyed and is added over and over again to the damages and despite the fact that an atacker has less loses in reality he lost much more compared with the target (nobody count the deuteryum consumption for a big fleet movement). Also nobody cout the IPM's or the real destruction produced by IPM's
I think that will be more interesting if we will post only the real damages produced to the fleets in terms of big ships: Cruisers, Batleships, Bombers, Destroyers, DS's.
Of course this will be another problem to follow complete the reports and start to make another calculations.
Trying to calculate deuterium consumption on ALL fleet activities, calculating the actual losses from Defense, and adding up losses for each individual ship would make it more of a math challenge than an actual war.
What I'm wondering is why people are posting the defense-less farming runs?
