Re: Dacia VS AZG

#21
Rofl, don't go acting like Dacian was forced into the conflict.

Your members broke the NAP with the Fraternity COUNTLESS times, I was involved directly in quite a bit of them. God only knows how many times it was broken with AZG.

Don't go around trying to act innocent.

Re: Dacia VS AZG

#22
Urweirdsaysi wrote:Rofl, don't go acting like Dacian was forced into the conflict.

Your members broke the NAP with the Fraternity COUNTLESS times, I was involved directly in quite a bit of them. God only knows how many times it was broken with AZG.

Don't go around trying to act innocent.
Black1 broke the T_F NAP by attacking rootbeer. eOs and me restored it. I don't remember you opening your mouth or fixing anything. AZG was spyed first by one of are members that doesn't speak english I had to have a translator to talk with him. Told AZG what was going on and no one was ever attacked, but probe retaliation was AZG threatened us with WAR 3 times or more. Third time is the charm friends they got there war. There are the facts.

Re: Dacia VS AZG

#23
And yet still you declared the war... the probes kept on coming long after your 1st petty excuse of translation - it was more 3 strikes for you, but i calmed my members down and contacted Dacian1 that everything was sorted out - and he said all's fine..

Anyways your lack of facts and communication skills are getting lame and tiresome to read, so hush and put your money where your mouth is!

Re: Dacia VS AZG

#24
I was asked by rootbeer to quit attacking Adassa, which I promptly did. I was then attacked (Multiple times, in fact) by Ilie a few days later, after it had been resolved. I contacted rootbeer (whom I assumed was the leader (Or high up in the ranks), since he was the one asking me on behalf of Adassa and no leader information is placed on your Alliance's page) about it and was told it was resolved. Couple days later, same thing, once again I was told it was resolved. Next day, SAME THING and when I finally threatened to continue my attacks on Adassa, the attacks miraculously stopped. I was still probed by multiple members, which I passed off as a simple accident and said nothing more.

I've been informed multiple times of Dacia attacking T_F members without provocation.

Dacia has a tendency to completely disregard NAPs. I've seen this first hand, as have many members of the Alliance. What I find odd is that when one of your members is attacked, you immediately bring up the NAP but you seem to forget about it whenever you see our players in the universe. Odd how that works, isn't it?

Re: Dacia VS AZG

#25
Defiant wrote:And yet still you declared the war... the probes kept on coming long after your 1st petty excuse of translation - it was more 3 strikes for you, but i calmed my members down and contacted Dacian1 that everything was sorted out - and he said all's fine..

Anyways your lack of facts and communication skills are getting lame and tiresome to read, so hush and put your money where your mouth is!
Your forget your words on here will get you slaughtered in game watch your words carefully last 2 days we recieved theats I don't care who you are.

Re: Dacia VS AZG

#26
Urweirdsaysi wrote:I was asked by rootbeer to quit attacking Adassa, which I promptly did. I was then attacked (Multiple times, in fact) by Ilie a few days later, after it had been resolved. I contacted rootbeer (whom I assumed was the leader (Or high up in the ranks), since he was the one asking me on behalf of Adassa and no leader information is placed on your Alliance's page) about it and was told it was resolved. Couple days later, same thing, once again I was told it was resolved. Next day, SAME THING and when I finally threatened to continue my attacks on Adassa, the attacks miraculously stopped. I was still probed by multiple members, which I passed off as a simple accident and said nothing more.

I've been informed multiple times of Dacia attacking T_F members without provocation.

Dacia has a tendency to completely disregard NAPs. I've seen this first hand, as have many members of the Alliance. What I find odd is that when one of your members is attacked, you immediately bring up the NAP but you seem to forget about it whenever you see our players in the universe. Odd how that works, isn't it?
So, you originally broke the NAP cool thanks for clearing that up have a nice day. It's been fixed don't worry your lil head about it.

Re: Dacia VS AZG

#28
plainstrider wrote:
Urweirdsaysi wrote:I was asked by rootbeer to quit attacking Adassa, which I promptly did. I was then attacked (Multiple times, in fact) by Ilie a few days later, after it had been resolved. I contacted rootbeer (whom I assumed was the leader (Or high up in the ranks), since he was the one asking me on behalf of Adassa and no leader information is placed on your Alliance's page) about it and was told it was resolved. Couple days later, same thing, once again I was told it was resolved. Next day, SAME THING and when I finally threatened to continue my attacks on Adassa, the attacks miraculously stopped. I was still probed by multiple members, which I passed off as a simple accident and said nothing more.

I've been informed multiple times of Dacia attacking T_F members without provocation.

Dacia has a tendency to completely disregard NAPs. I've seen this first hand, as have many members of the Alliance. What I find odd is that when one of your members is attacked, you immediately bring up the NAP but you seem to forget about it whenever you see our players in the universe. Odd how that works, isn't it?
So, you originally broke the NAP cool thanks for clearing that up have a nice day. It's been fixed don't worry your lil head about it.
You need to get your timeline straight. That happened before we had an official NAP with Dacia. I was asked to quit attacking because we were both allied with AZG. Your members wanted a NAP that work for them, not for both of us. And now that we have a NAP, it is still broken very often.

Re: Dacia VS AZG

#29
Urweirdsaysi wrote: You need to get your timeline straight. That happened before we had an official NAP with Dacia. I was asked to quit attacking because we were both allied with AZG. Your members wanted a NAP that work for them, not for both of us. And now that we have a NAP, it is still broken very often.
Really doesn't matter when I asked Black1 why he broke the NAP he said he never had one with Dacia they were just normally nuetral with Dacia, because we were both allies with AZG. So, that night i took his fleet he has been in vacation mode ever since and me and eOs later got together created the NAP between Dacia and T_F. Yea eOs broke it the other day by accident he replaced exactly what was lost and came to me and we worked it all out like adults we didn't threaten ech other or anything. I told AZG if they had a problem come to me no onne ever came to me i always went to them when a member of Dacia brought the problem to my attention. Dacain1 was sent threats as well. Thats the difference and why there is a war how they handle themselves nothing more nothing less.

Re: Dacia VS AZG

#30
Haha, this is comical! I thought there was something funny about this war, I knew you guys were allies. And you come to ~V~ looking for a NAP while at war with AZG? I mean, you are stepping in on our war now (AFTER we weakened them significantly, almost nothing left and you guys cant handle the few fleets that are left).

And to think this is what happens to an alliance you an NAP with before?!
cron