Legitimate question, not bait, no flamers please.

#1
Is raiding your own members of your alliance with the approval of the defending party a legit way around the milking rule? This i'm sure is not only going on in generals (which it is, caught some on phalanx), but i'm sure everywhere else as well. So just a simple answer with constructive feedback will do, no rage or flaming, or any of that garbage please.


EDIT*

Guess this found its way into the standard section some how, well, an admin can move it in the correct place. My bad.
Image

Re: Legitimate question, not bait, no flamers please.

#2
i know the cords of the planets in general used and by who. they built the buildings no defense and saw on my planx his teamate raiding it(our him on another acct). i believe that is unfair. you say you would like players to join and stay but if people are allowed to pretty much make milking accounts it ruins the game. zorg just ask me the people and i shall tell you as i have already sent u a email about. i love generals and thought about joining a real server but if ppl are allowed to bend the rules to stay ahead then really its no point in wasting my time. thx

Re: Legitimate question, not bait, no flamers please.

#5
The first thing I would think is that they are just trying to massage the attacking and raiding scores, as has happened before.

If a team mate leaves a fleet or resources sitting because they are just poor players, I can understand why you would attack them, taking their stuff before the opposition can. But just for the sake of getting points, basically, that would be cheating. AS I have said, it has happened.

So, if I was to see that happening, I would report it. I have seen it before, you raid all day, get your score. Then someone raids 250 million in 5 minutes on a slow server like Standard. We watched his total raids. Four or five raids later he'd scored another 120 million. There simply isn't that much in the way of resources in that aforementioned server. The leader of that alliance gave the usual "It's not in the rules so it's not breaking the rules" answer.

Doesn't make it right though, does it?
cron