With respect Mickylove, please read it again. An alliance with only a single member cannot declare war on another alliance with only one member. However, an alliance with several members can declare war against another alliance with only one member, or indeed a single individual with no alliance. It is not the best written part of the rules, but if you please take note of the word "both", then you will see what I mean.

Boris wrote:I Did not remember that i was legal to declare ware vs a 1 man alliance...
Further more i would like to report a violation of the bashing rules since i have been attacked seven time by the moderator.
Even within the standard of this declaration, it is not legal.
I want you punished according the rules of Zorg.
Rules are there for a reason, so you should be banned for at least a day according to the rules of Boris.

It might be wise to replace you as a moderator if you can not live by your own rules...

I am still trying to obtain a second member so you can shed your bloody wrath on me...
Kind regards,
Boris Intergalatic Criminal...

ps..
Bending the rules just because you are in charge is kind of lame!

Please could you elaborate on the "Rules of Boris"? We can see how much the differ from the game rules.

Boris wrote:Ok, i rest my case...
Was there not some part in the rules that said i had to accept the war...
Well I accept it, because i hate bullies...

I was going to get a second member anyway so lets get started..
Boris over and IPR

Haha, bullies, always the joker, lol


Missile attacks for no reason, okay, just ignore them eh?


But, as you say, TO WAR, TO WAR!!!

let's go!

-Wars may not be declared if both alliances have only a single member, or the alliance warring with an individual has only a single member.


I think ur find its covered here in this rule oz again no war is allow in this situation

Again with respect Mickylove, you are missing it.

"both alliances have only a single member". We have 11 members, he has 1 member. So that part is irrelevant. "Both" is the key.

"or the alliance warring with and individual has only a single member". Again we have 11 members, he has 1. The alliance warring with him, my alliance, Blue Sun has 11 members, not a single member. "Single" is the key here, we have 11 members, not a single member.

To quote myself

mickylove wrote:-Wars may not be declared if both alliances have only a single member, or the alliance warring with an individual has only a single member.


I think ur find its covered here in this rule oz again no war is allow in this situation

That's why we have this rule so alliance with more members can not war with one so read it understand it I get the rule u quoted and is not reverent here

I agree with Micky and Boris here

Excuse me but you quoted the rule. It is relevant here, thanks for quoting it.

It clearly states that I am correct. Unfortunately you are reading it differently to me.

I know i am correct, but you also feel the same way. That is your prerogative. But until we can see eye to eye I feel that we are both wasting our respective time. In that case I will cease to argue the point with you because I feel that it is going nowhere and we will both become annoyed. Rather than that happen, I feel it's best that we both agree to dis-agree.

In the meantime, until I am told by Zorg that I am wrong, the war will continue. I feel however that this will not happen.
Thanks for your input Mickylove, debate is a good thing.

Calvin wrote:I agree with Micky and Boris here

How come Calvin. where is it confusing?

Oz its not against you but this war is against the rules I don't know Boris but he is on his own against 11 do u really think there's a rule to stop one declareing a war against 11 but not one rule for 11 against one