wierd combat report

#1
The following fleets faced Sun, 10 May 2009 17:42:08 +0000 :


Attacker curtis [xxxxx]
Weapons: 0 % Shields: 0 % Armor: 0 % Type L. Cargo. B.ship Destroyer. Battlecruiser
Number 250 797 40 100
Weapon 12 2.280 4.080 1.462
Shield 62 480 1.133 880
Armour 3.150 12.600 23.100 14.700



Defender cyr [zxxxxx]
Weapons: 0 % Shields: 0 % Armor: 0 % Type L. Cargo. B.ship E. Probe Bomber Solar Satellite. Destroyer. Battlecruiser R. Launcher Light Laser. Heavy Laser Gauss Cannon Ion Cannon
Number 3 10 12 2 1.979 2 7 10 13 4 1 2
Weapon 7 1.462 0 1.581 2 3.672 1.023 121 165 404 1.795 252
Shield 41 339 0 696 17 648 749 38 44 174 330 824
Armour 2.400 9.600 136 12.000 88 17.600 11.200 400 160 1.040 4.800 1.200



The attacking fleet fires for 2.129.550 on the defender. The defender shields absord 49.273 points of damage.
The defensive fleet fires back for 43.113 against the attacker. The attacker shields absorb 43.113 points of damage.


Attacker curtis [xxxxx]
Weapons: 0 % Shields: 0 % Armor: 0 % Type L. Cargo. B.ship Destroyer. Battlecruiser
Number 248 792 40 99
Weapon 13 2.736 5.760 1.663
Shield 52 475 913 827
Armour 3.150 12.600 23.100 14.700



Defender cyr [xxxxx]
Weapons: % Shields: 0 % Armor: % Type L. Cargo. B.ship Bomber Solar Satellite. Destroyer. Battlecruiser Heavy Laser Gauss Cannon Ion Cannon
Number 1 3 2 817 1 6 2 1 2
Weapon 9 1.734 1.598 2 3.808 1.000 455 1.833 263
Shield 38 304 704 13 752 582 190 358 680
Armour 2.400 9.600 12.000 88 17.600 11.200 1.040 4.800 1.200



The attacking fleet fires for 2.565.301 on the defender. The defender shields absord 19.553 points of damage.
The defensive fleet fires back for 22.994 against the attacker. The attacker shields absorb 22.994 points of damage.


Attacker curtis [xxxx]
Weapons: 140 % Shields: 110 % Armor: 120 % Type L. Cargo. B.ship Destroyer. Battlecruiser
Number 245 785 40 98
Weapon 14 2.544 5.376 1.579
Shield 54 440 1.232 898
Armour 3.150 12.600 23.100 14.700



Defender cyr [4x]
Weapons: % Shields: 0 % Armor: 0 % Type Bomber Destroyer. Battlecruiser Gauss Cannon
Number 2 1 3 1
Weapon 1.581 3.434 1.250 1.496
Shield 744 920 749 349
Armour 12.000 17.600 11.200 4.800



The attacking fleet fires for 2.370.193 on the defender. The defender shields absord 5.003 points of damage.
The defensive fleet fires back for 11.840 against the attacker. The attacker shields absorb 11.840 points of damage.


Attacker curtis [4xxxxx]
Weapons: 0 % Shields: 0 % Armor: 1 % Type L. Cargo. B.ship Destroyer. Battlecruiser
Number 243 779 40 97
Weapon 10 2.376 4.848 1.697
Shield 46 493 1.111 880
Armour 3.150 12.600 23.100 14.700



Defender cyr [xxxxx]
Weapons: 0 % Shields: 0 % Armor: 0 %
Destroyed!
The attacker has won the battle !
You receive 679951 units of Metal, 139490 units of Crystal and 322726 units of Deuterium.
The attacker has lost a total of 1.395.000 units.
The defender has lost a total of 2.712.650 units.
A debris field containing 1.257.090 units of Metal and 1.142.100 units of Crystal has formed in orbit around the planet.
The probability of creating a moon is : 20 %
A moon has formed around the planet mars [xxxxxx] !
Report created in 0.00502490997314 seconds

is this a glitch?because i lost alot of bs but it says i absorbed all the damage :?: :geek:
Image

Re: wierd combat report

#2
From what I understand, there is a chance that ships can be destroyed when the opposing fleet does a certain amount of damage even if the shields are greater than their attack value. I lose ships like this all time.
Image

"You are in a position to demand nothing. I however, am in a position to grant nothing."

Khan Noonian Singh

Re: wierd combat report

#3
As we keep telling the players time and time again. The battle engine is not fully functional right now, it still has some bugs and glitches that need to be ironed out. Reports like this have been posted countless times, every player has the same problem as you, just deal with it and move on.

The next person to post up a topic like this will receive a warning.

Topic closed.


-Istalris-
Image
When people ask me plz because it's shorter than please, i feel inclined to respond no because it's shorter than yes...