Page 1 of 2

Destroyer1996 VS. scottpost4

Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 12:18 am
by AdmiralCole
The following fleets faced Sun, 17 May 2009 00:10:18 +0000 : :D


Attacker destroyer1996
Weapons: : 50 % Type S. Cargo. L. Cargo. L. Fighter H. Fighter Cruiser B.ship
Number 7 3 40 30 4 9




Defender scottpost4 ////-- Type S. Cargo. L. Cargo. L. Fighter H. Fighter Cruiser Colony Ship Recycler E. Probe Solar Satellite. R. Launcher Light Laser. Heavy Laser Gauss Cannon Ion Cannon S. Shield Dome
Number 1 7 31 24 5 2 3 5 60 34 22 7 1 7 1







The attacking fleet fires for 12.066 on the defender. The defender shields absord 0 points of damage.
The defensive fleet fires back for 8.552 against the attacker. The attacker shields absorb 0 points of damage.
The battle ends in a tie !
The attacker has lost a total of 678.000 units.
The defender has lost a total of 551.250 units.
A debris field containing 450.000 units of Metal and 199.350 units of Crystal has formed in orbit around the planet.
The probability of creating a moon is : 6 %

Report created in 0.0180749893188 seconds
How did it end in a tie I destroyed him? :D

I also knocked him down to being a newbie again. :|

Re: Destroyer1996 VS. scottpost4

Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 12:28 am
by AdmiralCole
Sorry about the fleet there Scott.

STOP DOUBLE POSTING- Slash

Re: Destroyer1996 VS. scottpost4

Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 1:29 am
by scottpost4
I'm not terribly concerned about the fleet, or the defences or shields or any of that. I play for fun, and not really for war.

That's why I invited your alliance to join a non-aggression pact with mine... remember? That NAP request I sent out just a tender few moments before I was attacked.

And imagine my disbelief when I noticed that those who attacked me were the very ones I was inviting peace with.

I expect to get attacked, and to lose stuff... such is the risk (and fun) of multi-player games. I just wasn't expecting it from someone I invited peace with. I did not expect an attack during negotiations of an NAP...

"We'll just consider it for a bit..."
Boom! (Attack...)
"But we're still considering it..."

No hard feelings though. Time to shake hands and get over it. I'll still consider that NAP if you're willing to grant it (preferably with limited further attacks) -- we're always looking for friends.

Re: Destroyer1996 VS. scottpost4

Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 1:31 am
by AdmiralCole
I "destroyed" ( hence my name ) half of your fleet and you do not care perhaps a little counterattack... 8-)

Re: Destroyer1996 VS. scottpost4

Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 1:38 am
by AdmiralCole
Fine if you want to play pacifist today fine, just count that as trading moonshots. ;)

Re: Destroyer1996 VS. scottpost4

Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 1:42 am
by scottpost4
The fact I stated I do not care does not suggest I want to lose my fleet. I only wished for a form of alliance between us two...

Re: Destroyer1996 VS. scottpost4

Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 1:44 am
by AdmiralCole
I am not much one for peace :shock: ( once again hence my name ).So now do we need to declare war on each other or is this a simple skirmish. :?:

Re: Destroyer1996 VS. scottpost4

Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 2:01 am
by scottpost4
I would have to go with skirmish. There is no point in me entertaining a war, but perhaps --if you wish-- someday we shall...

Re: Destroyer1996 VS. scottpost4

Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 2:04 am
by AdmiralCole
Guess what someday is today :twisted:

Re: Destroyer1996 VS. scottpost4

Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 2:10 am
by decadence
Somebody is trying to place himself on a spotlight.
Maybe someone will give him the attention he wants. :twisted: