Re: Ahilles[SW] VS Raynor[BLUE SUN] TD=2.660.285.000

#11
So now, apart from being wrong, you accuse others of lying?

You say "You are no law in this dispute! If he himself has left , you no dispute on his behalf!" I am not doing this on his behalf. I am doing this for my alliance which had nothing to do with this player when you attacked him. He had left our "union" a day, possibly even two days before you destroyed his fleet. Your heading IS WRONG. I have EVERY right to post what I want, when I want in defence of my alliance, when you are evidently wrong. He WAS NOT IN BLUE SUN, YOU ARE WRONG. The dates PROVE that. You are wrong. I do not know when you destroyed his moon, you have not posted that. I do not need to see that. If you did indeed destroy that moon whilst he was with us, fair enough. When you destroyed his fleet, he WAS INDEPENDENT. He had left nearly a DAY before you hit his fleet. Your heading is WRONG!

If you are saying you destroyed his fleet whilst he was still with us, then I think you should look in a mirror if you want to see that liar you were talking about!
Last edited by Ozymandias on Mon Nov 10, 2014 7:50 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Re: Ahilles[SW] VS Raynor[BLUE SUN] TD=2.660.285.000

#12
*Redacted*

There were about 10 -11 hours to landing fleet. So I sleep like a dude and let the battle for later.


*Redacted*


But when I attacked the fleet, I noticed that he has no union. I decided that the title is correct, so I wrote it that way.

Edit: The dispute developed into exchanging insults no pattern to participate.

Both parties must agree(attacker and defender) before a combat report can be posted in chat or fourms, - Verbal Warning, JaD
Image

Re: Ahilles[SW] VS Raynor[BLUE SUN] TD=2.660.285.000

#13
"I noticed that he has no union. I decided that the title is correct, so I wrote it that way. "

You have just said it yourself! An admission that you are wrong!!

You finally admit you ARE WRONG, and even though you accept that you ARE WRONG, you think the title is correct, hahahahaha.

So, he is not in an alliance. I think then, in that case, every fleet I hit, I should post the combat reports here,

Like this Mighty0z (Blue Sun) Vs "ANY PLAYER" (Shining Winds) ,

Whether they are in your alliance or not? lol. An excellent bit of reasoning there I DON'T THINK, lol.

If that's not the case, then please explain more, I can't stop giggling at the logic. It's about as clear as mud!

Re: Ahilles[SW] VS Raynor[BLUE SUN] TD=2.660.285.000

#15
Not as much as yours. Pinochilles!

Sat 08 Nov 08:27 am. He told me he was leaving, before I'd come online

Sun 09 Nov 2014 05:30 am. Your fleet hit his fleet.

21 hours, that is getting towards that day.

You said, "There were about 10 -11 hours to landing fleet. So I sleep like a dude and let the battle for later."

So, going by your very words, he had not been in Blue Sun alliance for a good 10-11 hours AT LEAST , BEFORE you even launched against his fleet.

So all your conspiracy theories are what ever day dreams you are having are irrelevant. YOUR FLEET TOOK 10-11 hours to reach target. Meaning Another 10-11 hours at least that he'd already become independent, BEFORE you launched at him.

Clock doesn't lie Pinochilles, even if some CERTAIN players do!

Re: Ahilles[SW] VS Raynor[BLUE SUN] TD=2.660.285.000

#16
Keep this post on topic and stop provoking each other, If he was not apart of the alliance at the time of the hit the tag should be removed from the header, As i cannot prove either way if he was or wasnt I will not remove the tag....If you can prove otherwise please message me privately - JaD On a personal note as a long time player of the game Oz it is not a negative reflection to your alliance either way if he was crashed, Thus is the nature of the game no one player is invincible and everyone makes mistakes, Please stop with the personal insults/attacks and accusations or i will have to start the warnings...


Any further argument can be taken up in PM's with with me. Thanks - JaD
Image