Re: .:-Azrwngs+Angel Alliance-:.= Azrwngs' "The Shield"

#4
Thanks Urweird!
Gamepro41 wrote:hello and does this mean that AZG since it has an alliance with Azure wings now cannot make attacks against rival Angel Alliance members? are they actually joining you or are they staying Angel Alliance?
The members of Angel Alliance will be members of Azure Wings. They will have their own division, however, so that they may maintiain a group and not "get lost" among our members. We have 6 divisions in Azure Wings:

Div. 1- Gale
Div. 2 - Kabal
Div. 3 - Gavo
Div. 4 - Hell-Fox
"The Core" - Ex-Romans
"The Shield" - Ex-Angels
_______________________Public Relations Administrator______________________
Image

__________________A tongue of silver is worth plenty in gold._________________
[/color]

Re: .:-Azrwngs+Angel Alliance-:.= Azrwngs' "The Shield"

#7
not to sound to hypocritical here..but it really can't be said without sounding so..

these kind of pacts are the reason why the mass fleeters get stronger ...honestly

division 1 can't attack anyone from division 6 cause they are at pact with division 4 etc etc..

now you have 1 alliance which has the top fleeters..via score...they hunt down members of said divisions..

now all these divisions..they grow sure..but at what % vs the small grp of fleeters??

ye need only go back to the funny but also serious African Wild to understand where i am coming from..the more the #'s grow..the further behind the grp as a whole becomes.

Bottom line.. as long as their are jerks like me who want to PvP and not HTB (hug the bear) large # alliances are at risk of getting bogged down and fall behind

and another example..take Vengeances 2 wars..the 1st with Azguard and the 2nd with HF...

1st war 130+ members vs 9-10 whatever it was...it was ALOT easier for the 10 to find a target to smash vs the larger #'s
as opposed to war 2 HF..where you had 12 13 members vs an equal amount.

its all about the food chain .. and every action has an equal and opposite reaction

you see this is good news when the reality is it is actually great news for me and those who hunt like myself

Re: .:-Azrwngs+Angel Alliance-:.= Azrwngs' "The Shield"

#8
I think at the time of the V-AZG war we had 60 members, and thats the most AZG has had since I joined. Not 130+ ;)
But yes, your point remains. Im getting seriously annoyed about the amount of moronicAZR players Im seeing not FSing on planets with no defence (Cardinal Sin) Trying to pull a Khan vs Belligeran (Cant happen now that the community has discovered math and Fleets aretoo large) or FSing from planet to planet.
Lets hope AZR doesnt learn the way we did, and shape up now.
Image
++MORTURI NOLUMNUS MORI++OMNISSIAH SAEVIO PROCUL VESTRI HIC++VOS ERO DEFAECO++NEX UT HOSTILIS DEUS OF MACHINA++

Re: .:-Azrwngs+Angel Alliance-:.= Azrwngs' "The Shield"

#9
The reason why we dont do divisino anymore is particularyly that, in the top 10 alliances discussion when azures wings came up as "farms" all the time that hit home with gale and shell confirm, which is why Im not so "open door" as she was , its all about fewer member s being active enough to be good, hopefully well be back up there bu point not sheer numbers
Image
_______
http://www.makkiconsultant.com

Re: .:-Azrwngs+Angel Alliance-:.= Azrwngs' "The Shield"

#10
What makes you so sure that I'll "confirm"?...I was no "open door" to inactives, I just didn't stress fleet saving enough (apparently..even though I reminded my members almost every other day...). Why do you think I made a number limit after that? You say you want to be back up by points and not numbers, but after I gave ownership to you, you disregarded the number limit.

I won't "confirm" anything by saying that I was an "open door" to inactive divisions/individuals. The only inactives I had were on vacation and told me ahead of time before leaving. Whether they remembered to go into V-Mode or not was none of my concern. I told them ahead of time that whatever they came back to (farmed or not) was 100% their punishment for not doing so and that I would refuse to protect them if they did not fleetsave or were irresponsible with resources, because in all honesty, that's THEIR fault. I don't call that going exactly going easy on them. I think people got the wrong idea on how I ran things. I'd let honorable players in, and I would protect the RESPONSIBLE ones.

I'll speak for myself next time ;), but thanks.
_______________________Public Relations Administrator______________________
Image

__________________A tongue of silver is worth plenty in gold._________________
[/color]