Page 1 of 4
why won't you attack SBT
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 6:47 am
by -Death-
this way we dont hijack anyones thread...my reason...my fleet went poof...cause i'm the cheater from toleder...its true just ask the perfect running system that doesn't glitch know as the zorg machine..its only an mirrage that there is a bug section in the forums..its not really there!
1 warning for flaming! stop it me!
Re: why won't you attack SBT
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 6:52 am
by Sadbutrue
attack who? you were always on the menu i dont know what you want from me? its not my fault you cheat and glitch or what ever.
Re: why won't you attack SBT
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 6:55 am
by -Death-
it was a general question to community why noone attacks you!...couldnt have wanted it to bad..that old fleet sat on a moon unattended every night just waitting to be crashed
Re: why won't you attack SBT
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:15 am
by Sadbutrue
oh you are reset and now you will post player habits in the forum? why dont you paste spy reports in here you are obviously pissed off at something. dont get snippy with me i had to claw my way up the rankings. many of you had many chances to crash me apparently but you failed... maybe you know the reason better then anyone here. i smashed you when i has 1/2 your size. the combat report is still on this forum.
dont be bitter about getting caught cheating. to quote a respected poster here: "He wasn't banned outright? What luck."
Re: why won't you attack SBT
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:22 am
by The_Templar
I don't attack sadbutrue because he has a fleet 4 times + as mine.
Plus, if I was in his shoes, I wouldn't leave my fleet sitting there unless I had some kind of pact with the ones that have a fleet capable to defeat mine (these ones are not many in his case).
Everything seems logical and legitimate, I really don't understand the question gump...
"dont be bitter about getting caught cheating"
Come on sadbutrue, gumppy would never cheat, now you are the one who is being mean and bitter.
Address these feelings to the ones who don't like you, not to the ones who respect you as an opponent except for the jokes and teases in the forums.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e71e/8e71ec1fa38d55d51bf0ae0065c64560aed37546" alt="Sad :("
Re: why won't you attack SBT
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:36 am
by Sadbutrue
well you are right i know tha gumppy did not cheat. i know because it happened to my buddy. gumps is a good guy but you dont attack someone verbally in a forum and not expect a bit of mud thrown back. but i have kept the flaming to 0 and just used facts that were posted in the forum so far. do i look like someone that would just take abuse lie down? I have played this game according to my own standards and part of it to not cheat or use anything but strategy if the little cheating reset thing happened to me i am sure i would be crucified by all of RAWK and have it thrown in my face constantly.
Re: why won't you attack SBT
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:40 am
by The_Templar
No, you wouldn't be crucified by all of RAWK and have it thrown on your face constantly.
Re: why won't you attack SBT
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:50 am
by Sadbutrue
lol i got called a chicken-**** cheater by your leaders for using a legitimate attack on ista that i had verified to be alright. these same people post farming reports on an inactive V member like it matters. If you think such petty people would not enjoy seeing a V member reset and plaster the forum with "proof" that i cheat, you are naive.
Re: why won't you attack SBT
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 8:01 am
by The_Templar
Sadbutrue wrote:lol i got called a chicken-**** cheater by your leaders for using a legitimate attack on ista that i had verified to be alright. these same people post farming reports on an inactive V member like it matters. If you think such petty people would not enjoy seeing a V member reset and plaster the forum with "proof" that i cheat, you are naive.
Sadbutrue, RAWK has a founder but no leaders. Everyone in RAWK speaks his own opinion. There is nothing like a formal RAWK opinion on anyone or anything.
I will not go back to refer to a thread that has been locked. I will neither comment on the "petty people" expression you used, I will leave it to others to do that if they think they have to.
If I 'm not wrong, an inactive player is one that has an "i" tag, according to the game conditions.
And, yes, V getting farmed is indeed news.
Re: why won't you attack SBT
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 8:05 am
by Sadbutrue
a person is labeled inactive after they have not been active for 48 hours. this is a fact because after a person under newbie protection is inactive for 48 hours they lose their protection. the (i) is there to remove the bashing rules.
anyway i have no hard feeling towards anyone but if someone calls me out i wont back down