hunter216 wrote:Reaper i couldn't agree with you more. You pretty much hit just about all the facts.. To be honest at this point .. i dont even know what am i voting for on this poll ? if i vote yes than its the new tweeks and if i say no its the old way ? back to reverted ?

And btw what i said still goes about how alot of people relied on that duet from expos for fleet saving.

Harry please stop trolling these forums.. This thread is not about name calling.

And that is not even the argument.. so stop posting and putting words in peoples mouth.. i think if he wants to read what WE"RE talking about he can.. he doesnt have to read it from someone who has done nothing but FLAME this whole topic from the start.

dude, there IS no topic, and i cant fathom a reason why this is still even being discussed. you guys dont have a leg to stand on here. this is absurd.

You come in name calling everyone.. and then act like everything is normal.. if you didnt notice this topic was started by Zorg. You need to stop flaming\trolling. I think if you post again it is spam.

hunter216 wrote:You come in name calling everyone.. and then act like everything is normal.. if you didnt notice this topic was started by Zorg. You need to stop flaming\trolling. I think if you post again it is spam.

allright, forgive my flaming/trolling. i do agree with you all on one point, and one point only.

zorg should refund any lost ships during when the patch was applied.

but that is all.

--HBS

Harry how many times do you need to be told to stop trolling the forums you have no intelligent arguments to add to this conversation you just troll and flame people so that another thread gets locked.
If you want to flame go back to the UOH where you belong.
You had not a clue about expeditions in the first place so how can you have anything to add to this conversation.
Us adults are trying to have an adult conversation, children go away.

Here is our leg to stand on, when I first started you tried to play the tough guy and beat me into quiting this game.
You failed you did not make me quit and even with your incessant crying about expeditions until they were removed from the game will not get me to quit so you have failed again.
So here you are the tough guy that picked on the wrong guy and I used expeditions to grow my account bigger and better than yours.
Because of expeditions the small guy was able to stand up to the "tough" guy and put competition back into this server that was dieing because of people like you walking around here with your chest puffed out crashing 40 small cargos calling it a profit and making people quit.
That is our leg to stand on.
I really do not care anymore I do not need expeditions to beat you. I played this game before there ever were expeditions it was new to me when I came here.
I'm done arguing about expeditions I can really care less about it, I had to argue about it in 5 different threads already and here comes someone to flame another one up and get it closed.

1 warning. Stay on topic and keep the fights in UOH. -Desert_Reaper

For a final warning to all because I am starting to get tired to edit and delete topics just because 4 people think that making noise will lead anywhere; NO flaming, no admin baiting. You can talk about expeditions and how they should be. If you want to flame one another, go open a UNION of HONOR topic and flame all you want (still, let administration out of it).

For the record, I see no complete proposal as administrator required, therefore the head post will remain empty. You want something different, you have to provide it.

Don't fret over patrolling the thread Zorg, i got you covered

on topic.....


- resources no longer random
- expedition time 15 minutes/30 minutes (If you want the resources you need to be online playing more)
- EC's can no longer be sent, like the recyclers can't
- max resource = to half of total planetary income per hour for 15 minute exp / 2X for 30 minute exp
- Reduced ship loss
- Reduced ship gain
- More pictures

Much better, thank you scag