Re: Tactical Fleet Destroyer

#21
Zerggross wrote:
harryballsac wrote:even if he did leave, someone else would take the top spot and you would be complaining about that player. tharmon has very little fleet, this wasnt about that. every single one of my posts explain what it was about. HE LEFT HIS RESOURCE SITTING. period. and you maybe need glasses if you saw these cr's and you still say it was an unprofitable hit, either that or you really have no clue about this game.

look it is a game, and a war game at that. you realize in a war game there are attacks yes? if you dont like playing a WAR game and dealing with attacks, go play monopoly.

mod can we lock this as this is really going nowhere but in circles here.
It has became obvious to me that you have a learning disability. You actually managed to misinterpret every post that I wrote. That's quite something

LOL. i like that man, good stuff good stuff :)

mod, howabout a lock to end this silliness???
Image

Re: Tactical Fleet Destroyer

#30
harryballsac wrote:
Zerggross wrote:
harryballsac wrote:even if he did leave, someone else would take the top spot and you would be complaining about that player. tharmon has very little fleet, this wasnt about that. every single one of my posts explain what it was about. HE LEFT HIS RESOURCE SITTING. period. and you maybe need glasses if you saw these cr's and you still say it was an unprofitable hit, either that or you really have no clue about this game.

look it is a game, and a war game at that. you realize in a war game there are attacks yes? if you dont like playing a WAR game and dealing with attacks, go play monopoly.

mod can we lock this as this is really going nowhere but in circles here.
It has became obvious to me that you have a learning disability. You actually managed to misinterpret every post that I wrote. That's quite something

LOL. i like that man, good stuff good stuff :)

mod, howabout a lock to end this silliness???

I agree he has a learning difficulty lol :dance:
cron