Re: ban one man alliances from rankings
#12Indeed, I like that.
Forum Moderator: The Chill One ~ Gale Points: 52
The only thing standing between me and immortality is death.

Re: ban one man alliances from rankings
#13Most definite yes,It solve the obvious problem I thought no one was going to address
[pup did first btw]
[pup did first btw]
Gale points:ummm to far behind to care and too long since I got one to remember
That which is written without effort is usually read without enjoyment.

That which is written without effort is usually read without enjoyment.
Re: ban one man alliances from rankings
#14Bumping coz i think you need to look at players perspective zorg!
Re: ban one man alliances from rankings
#17So you got 3... Against all the one man alliances out there. Nothing wrong with em I say, I personally don't like seeing an alliance in the top10 just because it has 100 members in it. Id put a max cap on alliances before I put a minimum on them.
Xtreme Uni - Zorgon1
Standard Uni - Zorgon1
Speed Uni - Swerg
Massacre Uni - Pokemon_Master
Phear me o_O
Standard Uni - Zorgon1
Speed Uni - Swerg
Massacre Uni - Pokemon_Master
Phear me o_O
Re: ban one man alliances from rankings
#18More than 3 you will find
And a 'One man alliance' Is not an alliance, its just an individual with a tag
If players get in the top ranks for building a massive alliance im all for that.
And a 'One man alliance' Is not an alliance, its just an individual with a tag
If players get in the top ranks for building a massive alliance im all for that.
Re: ban one man alliances from rankings
#19If it takes the support of 100 people to get you to the top as a player... Meh, I just don't think it's worth changing.
Xtreme Uni - Zorgon1
Standard Uni - Zorgon1
Speed Uni - Swerg
Massacre Uni - Pokemon_Master
Phear me o_O
Standard Uni - Zorgon1
Speed Uni - Swerg
Massacre Uni - Pokemon_Master
Phear me o_O
Re: ban one man alliances from rankings
#20I don't like the idea of having to get a charter. I do however think that an alliance should have more than 1 person in it. The solution that I like best is to give 1 man alliances 3 days to acquire another member. After three days the alliance will automatically be dissolved if it does not have more than one member. To prevent people from creating an alliance again as soon as theirs is dissolved a cap on how frequently an individual can start an alliance would fix that problem, I suggest no more than one/week and 2/month.
Those with nothing to loose have the most to gain. Long live the Miner!