It seems to me that all you would be fleeters are looking for is more and more protection.. This is a war game the idea is we hunt and attack each other.. Yet you want the ability to hide.. a lot of moons are well over 9.8k now and these will require over 130k Rips to destroy.. Current rip production will mean these moons are safe for another 50 years or more.. (for God sake get real people.) I have found several moons that will require 150 years of game play to build the 300,000 Rips to destroy them.. This makes them impossible to destroy.. ridiculous..in this game.
Take it from me it is not possible to destroy 21 moons.. In the start of this game there was NO limit on MD and no one lost 21 moons. I am more than happy to put a restriction of say 10 moons per 24hrs in time of war this is less than half the potential of any one player.
I have deleted 4 moons of a player only for him to build 12 moons the same day... So if you all want the MD mission to stay at 4 per 24hrs then I would request this poll change to only 4 successful moonshot be allowed per 24hrs as well.. All I am only asking for is a equal balance in game play.. You to may find yourself in this position some time soon.. I will look forward to reading you post then..
One last point that none of you may know..but I have lost well over 1200 rips in unsuccessful MD missions over the years (not by ninja but just from failed missions).. It is a very expensive gamble and not as one sided as you may think. Try some yourselves.

Gozar wrote: I am more than happy to put a restriction of say 10 moons per 24hrs in time of war this is less than half the potential of any one player.

Like I sad before I'm not against increasing MD during wars. 10/24h seams fair enough for me. This is war game like u sad.

Gozar wrote: So if you all want the MD mission to stay at 4 per 24hrs then I would request this poll change to only 4 successful moonshot be allowed per 24hrs as well..

Also agree to this too. All should be in balance.

simple answer no change needed

I voted yes.

Agree, yes for me as well!