I have bought this up before.

But one man alliances should not be in the rankings, it should be a minimum of two to be shown in the rankings. Its such a rubbish thing to look at all these one man alliances and to me they are not true alliances!!!!

Delete them from the rankings for god sake!!!!!! grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

i agree...

Definitions of alliance

1.the act of allying or state of being allied.
2.a formal agreement or treaty between two or more nations to cooperate for specific purposes.
3.a merging of efforts or interests by persons, families, states, or organizations: an alliance between church and state.

I will say the same thing here that I said in the last topic like this:

KarrothMelu wrote:I would agree with this. One man alliances aren't made for rank normally anyway (and if they are, you can easily compare your points), so they don't need to be ranked.

KarrothMelu wrote:I will say the same thing here that I said in the last topic like this:

KarrothMelu wrote:I would agree with this. One man alliances aren't made for rank normally anyway (and if they are, you can easily compare your points), so they don't need to be ranked.

So can we arrange to have them taken out!

Cheers Zorg

PLEASE! take them out

One exclamation point should suffice ~KM

My suggestion: Alliance ranking to be ranked with Average player points, not by all player points. That way it seems that alliance with 100 members with 10k points each(1kk points) is "better" according to ranking that ally with 3 members with 300k points each (900k points) ...

Also: Take them out.

yes then everyones aliances would get a higher rank and then more people would join alliance and more people means higher ranks!!!!!!!

@slim70: Please comment WHAT I wrote, not WHAT YOU THINK I wrote!

I like this idea as well.

yeah good, good good good!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!