Re: Active Rankings
#12I disagree, this way you know right away that people are inactive and it gets easy to find them and raid them.Avatar wrote:Knowing some databases.... It would be far easier to simply move them out of the live rankings and have another ranking page that is for "away" players.
Say, when the system flags Vmode on a user, it simply just gets picked up in the query for the Vmode ranking page rather than the live ranking page which would simply need a query to ignore Vmode flags.
Backbone is already there, just needs a new ranking page and the query with filter to only show Vmode!
Or is it only about players in V-mode?
Re: Active Rankings
#13I endorse this idea 
.
.HURRRRRRRRRRRRRRR LIGHT LASERS DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
OM NOM NOM KTHXBAI
Re: Active Rankings
#14Jedi wrote:Avatar wrote:Or is it only about players in V-mode?
V-mode.
Re: Active Rankings
#16Zorg - Opinions please... I feel th whole rankings will change if this is put in place and i think its only fair for active players
Re: Active Rankings
#18how would u have the alliance ranking? cause there are loads of alliances are with big points in them with loads of dead weight. just thought i would add that too here. (In reading, anyone know how the alliance points are calculated? someone told me once but if forgotz)
Barbaric nomad causing P-A-I-N.
Re: Active Rankings
#19I think its total points of every member cumulated times 2.SPY wrote:how would u have the alliance ranking? cause there are loads of alliances are with big points in them with loads of dead weight. just thought i would add that too here. (In reading, anyone know how the alliance points are calculated? someone told me once but if forgotz)
Re: Active Rankings
#20Correct me if I am wrong but, if a person is in vmode and their points are set to zero (while in vmode). Then I would assume that they would have zero points to be calculated into alliance points.
