Tarian wrote:Just a note guys. Its not really important but the only REAL (fictionally real as a graviton particle doesn't exist) way to counter the weapon of a Death Star isn't by deflecting it. The only way to stop it is by firing a blast of antimatter (antigravitons to be precise) at the graviton blast. Thus the two blasts will annihilate each other, causing a great explosion in space, but not on the planet. Its just if you want to be more realistic and I'd like that better.

+1 to this guy, only they don't exist as far as we know.

Zorg wrote:We need a better deuterium consumption for Lunar Guardian (reducement) and a worse for RIP (Increase)

Lunar Guardian fuel consumption 2500

Death Star fuel consumption 3

love2scoobysnack wrote:

Zorg wrote:We need a better deuterium consumption for Lunar Guardian (reducement) and a worse for RIP (Increase)

Lunar Guardian fuel consumption 2500

Death Star fuel consumption 3

If the Death Star is going to use more deut then the speed should also increase.

I think the RIP is good as it is, the soul purpose of it was to be slow and destructive.
Changing the fuel consumption from 1 to 3 has almost no effect at all but changing the speed does.
Even so, I rather not like to have any changes on the RIPS.

I think that if you have a fleet of a few thousand Death Stars that increasing the duet consumption by 300% will have an effect. Also because you may have missed it let me quote Zorg again

Zorg wrote:We need a better deuterium consumption for Lunar Guardian (reducement) and a worse for RIP (Increase).

These decisions are not to be part of controversy. We only seek the right balance. We are interested in proposed ideas exactly on consumption. Shoot away with your reasoning. We will take a final decision in few time.

The way that I decided on 3 for the Death Star is that it is a full 300% more duet than before and 7 duet lower than the next closest ship. Although now that I think more about it the Death Star should be changed to 5 instead. The reason I suggested 2500 is because currently the Destroyer has the highest Duet consumption at 2000 and I got the idea from reading the description that a big deterrent to having a massive fleet of lunar guardians was that they would be too expensive to fleet save. However I would not be opposed if it were dropped to 2200.

I am 100% opposed to increasing the speed of the Death star because it will make it difficult if not impossible to do a long fleet save and to do a 2-3 day fleet save will become expensive because you will have to start hopping galaxies to do them.

To summarize I now want the Death Star to consume 5 Duet and the Lunar Guardian to consume 2200 Duet.

Will be implemented tomorrow in X-TREME

Implemented in X-TREME

Under long-term revision:
*Speed
*Building Cost (Structure points)
*RF ratings

This means chat on this MUST continue till it is perfected.

About the lunar guardian. It can defend itself against a death star nicely but it can't take more than 6 hits from a light fighter

That's kinda the point. It's not meant to be the ultimate ship; it's just supposed to be an anti-RIP ship.

The time to implement Lunar Guardian and Elite Cargo to Standard and Speed has came.

Elite Cargo is fine as it is so we only need a final verdict if we need any changes in LC before implementing them to the other 2 universes.