well my point here is not to get ruby or anything well why a post this here
a watch in each servers there are very good alliances
but a wish there is this that leader get 50 ruby by end of each weak why
well to reward his member for growing up .
well now you ask yourself if leader dont wanna give rubys
there is simple way ban him fo 3 days first time
if he spend everything for himself ban him one month
if leader become inactive allaince will automactiv change to member in allaince
post sugestions to make this posible it not must be 50 ruby it can be5 or 10 each weak
.
a hope to see good respond on this

http://i1097.photobucket.com/albums/g343/Akatcuki/Peinxd2323555.jpg

The problem I see with this is it would be forcing people to use rubies. Or what would happen with alliances with only one member? There are too many factors involved for this to work correctly. That and rubies would be worth next to nothing in the long run and Zorg would lose money.

big problem for zorg is
only ways to earn ruby is by contest in forum many players dont wanna use forum to get that
like in others you can earn well we will says ruby trought explorations
in this game you cant
about one member allaince he cant use that if you dont have at least 5 members or more,

http://i1097.photobucket.com/albums/g343/Akatcuki/Peinxd2323555.jpg

And for those alliances that don't want to use rubies?

Not sure what you mean't by that statement. If you mean't what if the alliance members don't want the leader to get rubies have a toggle whether you count for them getting it or not (making them need another person) or if you mean't they didn't want to get the rubies have an option where the leader can disable the income? Not sure if I even support the idea, but if this someone pass's these options would be needed .

allainces ho dont use rubys will reduce zorg coding and make it easer then ever

http://i1097.photobucket.com/albums/g343/Akatcuki/Peinxd2323555.jpg

As it is, it's probably hard enough to keep the servers afloat. I say that if a leader wants to do this, then they can purchase the rubies and help keep the servers online

Desert_Reaper wrote:As it is, it's probably hard enough to keep the servers afloat. I say that if a leader wants to do this, then they can purchase the rubies and help keep the servers online

+1 yea decided not for this heh.

Disapproved. If you want free rubies, use referral program.
If you can afford rubies, buy them; it does help the game.