TheLegendRjsturgill wrote:Maybe something you could work on doing, is getting something so that no one ship is able to come up with a 0 loss, that would make people have to build other ships, and you would see a lot better fleeting out of people.
hmmmm i dont think that is a good idea rj. think about it, a rip costs alot and even except for top 20 no one has the capability to build rips more than 15 per day if we consider a moderate raid income + mining returns.
if rips do not have 0 loss on hits players wont use them at all and only the top 20 or so ppl who well for whom cost is never much of a problem will over power the lower ppl with rips.
this actually goes for all band or rankings. ppl who can hardly afford BS wont use BS much for loosing too many of them and so forth for BC and DDs or any other ships.
regardless from that i do not see how it is actually connected to fuel consumption. the basic reasoning was not to introduce the risk of loosing ships but making a mere defense bash that can raise a TD of more than several million TD be costly enough that u are taking the risk for it to be profitable.
IPMs are there for defense bash but normally players do not use them cause it is expensive. unless there is enough scope for resources one will not use IPMs for defense bash. but with a rip armada as long as its a 0 loss hit it is a profitable hit.
i think that is what zorg wanted to mean there, tho he has to confirm if i am assessing right.
and i agree with him if he meant it that way.
Barbaric nomad causing P-A-I-N.