#5
by Pulsar
In my opinion, allowing any player to join in an ACS Attack or Defend mission gives the game a broader (if only slightly) range of possibilities for how players can combine forces in attempt to deal with stronger opponents (not that it really makes much difference on X, at the current moment...). If the fact that ACS Attack and Defend missions have the word "Alliance" in them is your only true reason for asking for change, it doesn't strike me as an incredibly compelling argument.
If you believe a certain player is sending attacks he or she knows will be ninja-ed as a way of donating extra resources to another player, that is a completely different issue, one that has nothing to do with ACS Attack missions, and one you should probably bring up with the Zorg privately... I personally don't think it's a good idea to bring accusations like this into the public forums (whether or not they are founded). Just my opinion.
As far as I understand it, contact between players is only restricted if the account owners are in a situation where for some reason they are playing from the same IP address, and this is only to prevent mufti-accounting. The fact that players may know each other or be related in real life does not (and imo, should not) disallow them from attacking, defending, transporting resources to one another, etc, etc, as long as there's no evidence of mufti-accounting.
Again, it sounds like the true concern here is pulling/pushing... If that's the concern, there's an explicit rule for that and the case can be reported.
