Post here a question you think we should ask the players of SPEED in a future survey.
Feel free to post here anytime. Once the time is right, we will filter through the most prominent ones and include them to our universe wide survey.
Surveys will greatly shape our directions in future decisions regarding the game, from now on.
We will though try to keep the number low to avoid annoyance. Perhaps 1 or 2 per year will do.
Re: Future Survey questions - SPEED
#2Here is a question for a future survey.
Is the speed of the speed server fast enough?
For example do you think ship speed should be faster, or if building times were quicker etc.
Is the speed of the speed server fast enough?
For example do you think ship speed should be faster, or if building times were quicker etc.
I'll take 96.875%
Re: Future Survey questions - SPEED
#3I think the increase of speed base relative to the investment in various engines research levels is to small.
Re: Future Survey questions - SPEED
#4Simba you need to frame that as a question, not a statement
20 GP
The Trouble Maker
As Swift as the Wind that carries the Sand comes your DEATH
Omega Class Thank You to Devola/Gale for this super amazing sig.
The Trouble Maker
As Swift as the Wind that carries the Sand comes your DEATH
Omega Class Thank You to Devola/Gale for this super amazing sig.
Re: Future Survey questions - SPEED
#5You are right.
So, let replace it:
-Do you think the increase of speed base relative to the investment in various engines research levels is to small ?
Having today a debate regarding the "V"mode:
- Do you think the time allowed for a player in " V" mode must be limited ?
So, let replace it:
-Do you think the increase of speed base relative to the investment in various engines research levels is to small ?
Having today a debate regarding the "V"mode:
- Do you think the time allowed for a player in " V" mode must be limited ?
Re: Future Survey questions - SPEED
#7Do you think inactive base (no buildingd) should have double or triple production?
Re: Future Survey questions - SPEED
#8I'm glad to hear the survey will be shorter. I think the length turned many people away from doing it.
My question would be: Do you think rubies or resource should be awarded to the weekly winners? (Attacker, defender, raider)
My question would be: Do you think rubies or resource should be awarded to the weekly winners? (Attacker, defender, raider)
Re: Future Survey questions - SPEED
#9Old post , but ok I'll bite.......Rewards for weekly winners is far too open to abuse.....Raider:Seen it plenty of times where raiders "gain" a billion res in a very short time with no crash involved.....yes it is possible, no it is not likely.....Defender:Reward for what, failing? Attackers: Defence bashing time.....so a big no from me...... -1!harryballsac wrote:I'm glad to hear the survey will be shorter. I think the length turned many people away from doing it.
My question would be: Do you think rubies or resource should be awarded to the weekly winners? (Attacker, defender, raider)
Re: Future Survey questions - SPEED
#10Lol dude I was really only talking about raider and attacker. I doubt zorg would give away rubies, but why not resource for those 2 top spots? If it is abused then it will have to be monitored closer. The top raider doesn't need fleet crashes to take the top spot, just many many hours of raiding. I'm just saying some incentive to engage the player base more would be a good idea.Sprog wrote:Old post , but ok I'll bite.......Rewards for weekly winners is far too open to abuse.....Raider:Seen it plenty of times where raiders "gain" a billion res in a very short time with no crash involved.....yes it is possible, no it is not likely.....Defender:Reward for what, failing? Attackers: Defence bashing time.....so a big no from me...... -1!harryballsac wrote:I'm glad to hear the survey will be shorter. I think the length turned many people away from doing it.
My question would be: Do you think rubies or resource should be awarded to the weekly winners? (Attacker, defender, raider)