Yes, but then any description in the research menu would be obsolete. That's not the point. If the game includes such specific descriptions, these should be complete and correct. It's about a consistent overall appearance of the game.

That's correct, the Elite Recyclers are not listed. There should be a more specific descriptive writing for the combustion drive as it mentions the small and large cargos but only recyclers, not the elite ones.

Thx for the reference, SilverVixen.

When checking the description of the Hyperdrive engine in the research menu, I missed the Lunar Guardian. It uses the hyperdrive engine I think, but that's not mentioned in the description. So maybe you find some minutes to update this and add the Lunars to the text.

mightyoz wrote:The difference with IPM's is they are not true combat, hence no combat report.

Then tell me plz., why does the player who gets attacked by IMPs gets a message showing the defensive structures that were hit. Makes no sense, afterall.....

Maybe you also think about implementing an automatic combat report for Missileattacks. The "manual" scan that has to be done by the launcher afterwards is somehow tiresome, don't you think so ?

So how did you decide, Master Zorg ?

Will Pulsars solution find a way into the game ?

I like Pulsars idea ! Sounds like a good solution.

Ok, Pulsar. That's what I wanted to know. Frustrating, right. But thx a lot !

Hello everybody, I built some missile silos and recognised a line in the description of the Silos that seems to be wrong, or at least irritating :) It says: " Each Silo level, also increases your IPMs range by 5 systems ." But when I checked the range of the IMPs from different planets with differen...