I dunno man, that doesn't seem like too bad of a fate.

Little do they know, they just switched from v to j.

Under the influence of a very addicting game.

Used to be a Leninist-Marxist. What made you come around to the ideology?

Ah, thank you, Pulsar.
And that is a lot of deuterium.

Point of clarification: Does "kk" mean million, or does it also mean thousand?

I see... I guess we could say that IPMs are most suited as a counterweapon against defense-heavy / turtling players, although with what mightyoz said about ABMs being easier to make than IPMs, it may not be effective even in that sense.

Oh, I see. Thank you for the immediate reply.

However, I have a new question. If IPMs only target planet-based defenses, exactly how useful are they when they cannot attack fleets, resources, or moons? Are they really worth building expensive silos and then acquiring the missiles themselves?

To confirm a doubt lingering in my mind:

Inter-Planetary Missiles will only target stationary defenses, right? Or will they also aim against fleets that are deployed to the planet being targeted?

As well, can IPMs target moons?

And what percentage of defenses, exactly, will be impacted in a strike?

MegaMedes does have a point. The "Important Rules" topic does not list "staying on-topic" as a requirement for posts within a certain topic. While Rule Number II ("Trolling") prohibits the posting of off-topic, extraneous, or otherwise harmful messages in a deliberate intent to disrupt normal discus...